John Furie Zacharias
having a bad day in a strange place
Thunderstorms Anywhere

Thunderstorms in the Imajica



 The different ways I don't like you 
 in a list that may never become organized
[Search Topics]

[Bush] [Fraggin']
[Iraq] [Conspiracy]
[Florida] [Evil Thumbnails]
[Iran] [Sex]
[NASA] [Movies]
[Politics] [GooTube]
[Media] [TIDGADA]
[Sports] [LBOH]



[Tag Board] [Archives]
   
<< January 2007 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

JfZ making a mess of the web
[@twitter] [@facebook]
[@playlist] [@plastic]
[@vodpod] [@zazzle]
[helpforum] [web-litter]
[verissimus] [morphine dreams]
[dark skies] [brilliant weeds]


Phreek-went Phaves
[blogs] [ezines] [rtmfd]
[eye candy] [ear candy]
[mind candy]

[Buy Thunderstorms Gear]
Get Some Effin' Gear

[Supported Causes]





Add to My Yahoo!
[+ favorites]
AddThis Feed Button
rss feed


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Privacy Policy


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Thursday, January 25, 2007
Bush: State of the Union


2007 SOTU

U.S. President George W. Bush came to a joint session of the U.S. Congress Tuesday night to give his 2007 State of the Union speech.  It has some traditional aspects and formalities, which were described by the C-Span host.  The protocol isn't as weird as the Sovereign speech in the United Kingdom that I watched earlier this year, but it was also much less entertaining.  The video and transcript are available at the White House.

According to the Nielson TV ratings available via FutonCritic, "FOX's "Idol" remains untouchable as "State of the Union" coverage disrupts most networks' lineups."  In the key 18-49 year-old TV demographic, three times as many people watched "Idol" as watched the President's State of the Union speech.

Sometimes, I think people just don't care anymore.  Either that, or it's just that Bush has lied so many times in the past that it's pointless to continue paying attention to anything that he has to say.  Given that Bush's popularity with average people is about equal to that of venereal disease, I'm not going to bother disecting his entire speech.

Rawr !
I would like to point out an ongoing lie about his administration foiling a terrorist plot: "We stopped an al Qaeda plot to fly a hijacked airplane into the tallest building on the West Coast."

He's starting to believe his own propaganda.  He trotted the Library Tower plot out last year to defend his wiretap program.  That "plot" turned out to be bogus, likely derived from a tortured confession.  Next, he'll be taking credit for saving the Sears Tower in Chicago from the Miami Seven al Qaeda cell.

I listened to the speech Tuesday night, expecting him to lay out the case to bomb Iran.  Everytime he speaks these days, he's making the case to attack Iran.  This speech was no exception.  People say that Bush/Cheney have no plan B.  I think they're wrong.  I think Plan B is to allow Iraq to freefall into anarchy and then blame Iran for it.

Most people wanted to hear what Bush was going to say about escalating the war in Iraq.  I'm not going to analyze that.  The U.S. Congress is acting (finally) to try to limit the Bush/Cheney madness.  We should see something formal in the upcoming weeks.

Virginia Senator Jim Webb gave the State of the Union response for the Democratic party.  A highly decorated Vietnam Veteran, Webb's son is a Marine currently serving in Iraq.  You can read that here or watch it here.  Stephen Zunes, from Foreign Policy in Focus, ripped apart the Iraq section of Bush's speech, line by line, here.

 






Posted at 01:45 am by John Furie Zacharias

evie
January 25, 2007   09:36 AM PST
 
out of curiousity, who are you voting for in the next presidential elections? as someone who watches the american political scene, sometimes i wonder if you know how lucky you are to have what you have (despite bush's erroneous policy making decisions decisions). the philippines is this close to becoming a banana republic.
J f Z
January 25, 2007   06:56 PM PST
 
Oddly enough, many of us in the United States feel that the last six years have been banana republic- like. Erosion of civil liberties, more executive power, a retreat from the world community (except where we invade) ... on and on.

As far as the 2008 Presidential elections ... Since I don't vote for any political party loyalty, I don't even think about it seriously this far in advance. First of all, there is a primary process and then the party delegates nominate their candidates. Since I'm not involved in those decisions, I just have to wait.

One thing I can tell you is that people need to think more clearly about the fact they will be electing two people. Would the U.S. have attacked Iraq if Cheney wasn't the Vice President? Maybe, maybe not.

 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Bookmark and Share



 
Previous Entry Home Next Entry